From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-428299-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 14094 invoked by alias); 23 Aug 2013 13:54:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 14027 invoked by uid 55); 23 Aug 2013 13:54:36 -0000
From: "tejohnson at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug regression/58221] [4.9 Regression]: Immense amount of execution regressions and increased test-time for cris-elf
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: regression
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.7.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tejohnson at google dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58221-4-n39Xas3gDZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58221-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg01223.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221

--- Comment #7 from Teresa Johnson <tejohnson at google dot com> ---
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:49 AM, kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
<gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58221
>
> --- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Teresa Johnson from comment #5)
>> Kaz, are you planning to apply your patch, or do you want me to test
>> it and commit it? I'm kicking off x86_64 tests with it right now, but
>> I didn't get the failure on that target and don't have on hand yet a
>> reproducer.
>
> I've tested it on sh4-linux only.  I've just fired bootstrap
> and the usual tests on i686-linux.  It will take hours on my
> slow host, though.  Could you apply the patch after your x86_64
> tests?

Will do, thanks.
Teresa

>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.