public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
@ 2013-08-23 7:56 su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
2013-08-23 8:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu @ 2013-08-23 7:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Bug ID: 58228
Summary: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
The current gcc trunk, as well as gcc 4.7 and 4.8, produces wrong code for the
following testcase on x86_64-linux when compiled at -O3 in both 32-bit and
64-bit modes. This is a regression from 4.6.x.
This seems to do with vectorization, as it goes away with -fno-tree-vectorize.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130822 (experimental) [trunk revision 201915] (GCC)
$ gcc-4.6 -O3 reduced.c
$ a.out
1
$ gcc-4.7 -O3 reduced.c
$ a.out
0
$ gcc-4.8 -O3 reduced.c
$ a.out
0
$ gcc-trunk -O3 reduced.c
$ a.out
0
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize reduced.c
$ a.out
1
$
--------------------------------------------
int printf (const char *, ...);
int a[8][8] = {{1}};
int b, c, d, e;
int main ()
{
for (c = 0; c < 8; c++)
for (b = 0; b < 2; b++)
a[b + 4][c] = a[c][0];
printf ("%d\n", a[4][4]);
return 0;
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
@ 2013-08-23 8:06 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-23 9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-08-23 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2013-08-23
CC| |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work| |4.6.3
Summary|wrong code (with |[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression]
|vectorization?) at -O3 on |wrong code (with
|x86_64-linux-gnu |vectorization?) at -O3 on
| |x86_64-linux-gnu
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail| |4.7.3, 4.8.1, 4.9.0
--- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Confirmed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
2013-08-23 8:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-08-23 9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-28 20:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-08-23 9:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r175704 .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
2013-08-23 8:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-23 9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-08-28 20:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-29 11:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-08-28 20:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This is nested vectorization, where the step in the inner loop is 0, while in
the outer loop is bigger than that, and for inv_p we look at the step in the
outer loop in that case, while we perhaps should look at the inner one.
Richard?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-08-28 20:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-08-29 11:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-30 7:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-08-29 11:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Mine.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-08-29 11:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-08-30 7:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-30 7:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-08-30 7:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 30 07:49:54 2013
New Revision: 202097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-08-30 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/58228
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_data_ref_access): Do not
allow invariant loads in nested loop vectorization.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr58228.c: New testcase.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr58228.c
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-08-30 7:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-08-30 7:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-03 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-08-30 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
Known to work| |4.9.0
Summary|[4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] |[4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong
|wrong code (with |code (with vectorization?)
|vectorization?) at -O3 on |at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
|x86_64-linux-gnu |
Known to fail|4.9.0 |
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk sofar.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-08-30 7:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-09-03 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-23 9:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-23 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-09-03 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Sep 3 12:16:28 2013
New Revision: 202216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=202216&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2013-09-03 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline
2013-08-30 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/58228
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_data_ref_access): Do not
allow invariant loads in nested loop vectorization.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr58228.c: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr58228.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_8-branch/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-09-03 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-23 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-23 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-23 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 23 09:46:18 2014
New Revision: 210847
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-05-23 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline
2013-08-30 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/58228
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_analyze_data_ref_access): Do not
allow invariant loads in nested loop vectorization.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr58228.c: New testcase.
2013-09-26 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/58539
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_create_epilog_for_reduction): Honor
the fact that debug statements are not taking part in loop-closed
SSA construction.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr58539.c: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr58228.c
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr58539.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
branches/gcc-4_7-branch/gcc/tree-vect-loop.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7 Regression] wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-05-23 9:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-05-23 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-05-23 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58228
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-23 9:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-08-23 7:56 [Bug tree-optimization/58228] New: wrong code (with vectorization?) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
2013-08-23 8:06 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-23 9:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-28 20:52 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-29 11:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-30 7:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-08-30 7:53 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-03 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-23 9:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58228] [4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-05-23 9:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).