From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-428715-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28451 invoked by alias); 30 Aug 2013 14:54:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28416 invoked by uid 48); 30 Aug 2013 14:54:49 -0000
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ada/58239] [4.9 regression] pretty-print.c:789: undefined reference to `operator delete(void*)'
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:54:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ada
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: build
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58239-4-IHbt1CWe5a@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58239-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58239-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg01639.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58239

--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Gabriel Dos Reis from comment #9)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> > note that the patch at:
> > 
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01460.html
> > 
> > is not quite enough to fix this on Darwin - since we use :
> > 
> >  %{static|static-libgcc|static-libstdc++:%:replace-outfile(-lstdc++
> > libstdc++.a%s)}
> > 
> > to implement -static-libstadc++.
> > 
> > The relevant dir needs to be added as "-B" for this to work - unfortunately,
> > I'm not able to look at this right now..
> 
> -static-libstdc++ was already being used before this patch.  So, the "-B"
> directories where already there.

"grep -R -static-libstdc++ gcc/ada" suggests that -static-libstdc++ only
appears in a Changelog entry.

also the gcc driver silently ignores -static-libstdc++.

certainly, the -B options are passed when other gcc components are built (or it
would fail to bootstrap on Darwin). 

However, your current patch fails with:
ld: file not found: libstdc++.a