From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11310 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2013 17:18:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11250 invoked by uid 48); 1 Oct 2013 17:18:23 -0000 From: "bugdal at aerifal dot cx" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/58245] -fstack-protector[-all] does not protect functions that call noreturn functions Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:18:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: bugdal at aerifal dot cx X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00053.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58245 --- Comment #7 from Rich Felker --- I claim it's a bug in that GCC should _either_ check the canary at some point, or eliminate the code that's loading the canary to begin with since it will never be checked.