From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20094 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2013 17:02:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20048 invoked by uid 48); 16 Sep 2013 17:02:45 -0000 From: "Woebbeking at web dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/58273] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Segmentation fault with C++11 Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Woebbeking at web dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.7.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg01160.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D58273 --- Comment #7 from Andr=C3=A9 W=C3=B6bbeking --- Thanks! >>From gcc-bugs-return-429921-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Sep 16 17:54:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32569 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2013 17:54:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32517 invoked by uid 48); 16 Sep 2013 17:54:11 -0000 From: "d.frey at gmx dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/58435] Applying a type transformation to a list: const ignored Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: d.frey at gmx dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg01161.txt.bz2 Content-length: 805 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58435 Daniel Frey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |d.frey at gmx dot de --- Comment #1 from Daniel Frey --- Note that it is triggered by the 'using', if you replace the mapping by template struct map { typedef const T type; }; and adapt 'apply' like this: template < template class F, template class L, typename... T > struct apply > { typedef L ::type...> type; }; the result changes to the expected: undefined reference to `void dummy >()'