public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/58346] ICE with SIGFPE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (affecting trunk, 4.8, 4.7, and 4.6)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-58346-4-r83ykvtCLZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-58346-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58346

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58346
> 
> --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> ---
> I think some of the uses of the zero-size-objects extension are ones for 
> which making an array of such objects is reasonable, but it makes sense to 
> give an error for trying to subtract pointers to such objects.

A similar (runtime) error can be provoked by subtracting pointers
to array elements of variable size that happen to have zero size
at runtime.

This all seems to be a can of worms which I'd rather shield the
middle-end from.  For example we assume that a[0] and a[1] never
alias.

Can we at least make arrays of zero-sized elements trigger undefined
behavior in our extension documentation?  We probably can paper
over the ICEs as they occur (testing coverage is very weak of course).


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-10  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-58346-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-09-08  8:13 ` [Bug ipa/58346] " mikpe at it dot uu.se
2013-09-09  8:29 ` [Bug c/58346] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-09  8:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-09-09 17:04 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2013-09-10  7:49 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2013-09-10 22:22 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2014-01-10 16:27 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-17 10:15 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-17 10:19 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-17 14:52 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-17 17:06 ` law at redhat dot com
2014-01-23 19:19 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-58346-4-r83ykvtCLZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).