From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-429942-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4195 invoked by alias); 16 Sep 2013 21:06:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4170 invoked by uid 48); 16 Sep 2013 21:06:27 -0000
From: "glisse at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/58437] Sorting value in reverse order is much slower compare to gcc44
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 21:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58437-4-uwHnhH9ab4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58437-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg01182.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58437

--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse <glisse at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ah forget my last message, I understand now you are really interested in how
long it takes to reverse-sort an already sorted vector. Indeed it does take
much longer with 4.6+ than with 4.4.