[Bug target/58491] New: FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

[Bug target/58491] New: FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491

            Bug ID: 58491
           Summary: FAIL:
                    ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc
                    (test for excess errors)
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
              Host: hppa64-hp-hpux*
            Target: hppa64-hp-hpux*
             Build: hppa64-hp-hpux*

Created attachment 30877
  --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30877&action=edit
Preprocessed source

spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc
-B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objd
ir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs
-B/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.9/hpp
a64-hp-hpux11.11/bin/ -B/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.9/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/lib/
-isystem
 /opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-4.9/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/include -isystem
/opt/gnu64/gcc/gcc-
4.9/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/sys-include
-B/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERT -fmessage-length=0 -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -g -O2
-g -O2 -DLOCALEDIR="." -nostdinc++
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
-I/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++
-I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/include/backward
-I/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc
-std=c++0x ./libtestc++.a -lm -o ./default.exe
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc:
In constructor '__gnu_cxx::normal_mv_distribution<_Dimen,
_RealType>::param_type::param_type() [with long unsigned int _Dimen = 2ul;
_RealType = double]':
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc:49:1:
internal compiler error: in build_polynomial_chrec, at tree-chrec.h:148
 }
 ^
libbacktrace could not find executable to open

 /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/cc1plus -fpreprocessed default.ii -quiet -dumpbase
d
efault.cc -auxbase default -g -g -O2 -O2 -std=c++11 -version -fmessage-length=0 
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -o default.s

[Bug tree-optimization/58491] FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491

John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|target                      |tree-optimization

--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Breakpoint 1, build_polynomial_chrec (loop_num=1, left=0x800003fffdad94e0, 
    right=0x800003fffddc0640) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-chrec.h:148
148        gcc_assert (TREE_TYPE (left) == TREE_TYPE (right));
(gdb) list
143    
144      /* Types of left and right sides of a chrec should be compatible.  */
145      if (POINTER_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (left)))
146        gcc_assert (ptrofftype_p (TREE_TYPE (right)));
147      else
148        gcc_assert (TREE_TYPE (left) == TREE_TYPE (right));
149    
150      if (chrec_zerop (right))
151        return left;
152    
(gdb) p debug_tree (left)
 <integer_cst 800003fffdad94e0 type <integer_type 800003fffddcf7e0 long
unsigned int> constant 16>
$1 = void
(gdb) p debug_tree (right)
 <integer_cst 800003fffddc0640 type <integer_type 800003fffddcf000 sizetype>
constant 8>
$2 = void
(gdb) bt
#0  build_polynomial_chrec (loop_num=1, left=0x800003fffdad94e0, 
    right=0x800003fffddc0640) at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-chrec.h:148
#1  0x400000000174c804 in chrec_fold_plus_1 (code=PLUS_EXPR, 
    type=0x800003fffddcf7e0, op0=0x800003fffbec1540, op1=0x800003fffd422c60)
    at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-chrec.c:290
#2  0x400000000174c804 in chrec_fold_plus_1 (code=PLUS_EXPR, 
    type=0x800003fffddcf7e0, op0=0x800003fffbec1540, op1=0x800003fffd422c60)
    at ../../gcc/gcc/tree-chrec.c:290

I believe "long unsigned int" and "sizetype" are compatilble.

[Bug tree-optimization/58491] FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

[danglin at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491

--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin <danglin at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Similar fails:
FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/parms.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/parms.cc (test for excess errors)
FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/operators/equal.cc (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/operators/inequal.cc (test for excess
errors)
FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/operators/serialize.cc (test for excess 
errors)
FAIL:
ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/requirements/explicit_instantiation/1.cc
(test for excess errors)

[Bug tree-optimization/58491] FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

[paolo.carlini at oracle dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491

--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
I suspect this is just PR58473.

[Bug tree-optimization/58491] FAIL: ext/random/normal_mv_distribution/cons/default.cc (test for excess errors)

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58491

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Yes.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58473 ***