From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7110 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2014 17:50:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7053 invoked by uid 48); 31 Oct 2014 17:49:57 -0000 From: "dcb314 at hotmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/58530] [4.9 Regression] crash in get_combined_adhoc_loc Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: dcb314 at hotmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg02525.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D58530 David Binderman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #4) > Seems to be fixed by 20131009, revision 203302 And it's come back again recently. Only -O2, not -O3, required this time. bug120.cc activemq/commands/ActiveMQBytesMessage.cpp: In member function =E2=80=98bool activemq::commands::ActiveMQMessageTemplate::propertyExists(const string= &) const [with T =3D cms::BytesMessage; std::string =3D std::basic_string]=E2=80=99: activemq/commands/ActiveMQBytesMessage.cpp:668:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault 0xc00a5c crash_signal(int) ../../src/trunk/gcc/toplev.c:356 0xce3aaa bb_seq_addr(basic_block_def*) ../../src/trunk/gcc/gimple.h:1393 0xce3aaa gsi_start_bb(basic_block_def*) ../../src/trunk/gcc/gimple-iterator.h:118 0xce3aaa fold_all_stmts(function*) ../../src/trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c:3570 0xce3aaa (anonymous namespace)::pass_forwprop::execute(function*) ../../src/trunk/gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c:3903 Please submit a full bug report, I think there may be some value in making sure that the source code of all new bug reports, before reduction, compiles ok at -O2 or maybe -O3. >>From gcc-bugs-return-465505-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Oct 31 18:05:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18121 invoked by alias); 31 Oct 2014 18:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18080 invoked by uid 48); 31 Oct 2014 18:05:04 -0000 From: "y.gribov at samsung dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/63694] [5.0 Regression] Build error compiling asan.c: strtoull undeclared Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 18:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: other X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: y.gribov at samsung dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2014-10/txt/msg02526.txt.bz2 Content-length: 239 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63694 --- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov --- John, would you mind sending a (tested) patch to gcc-patches? I only have access to Linux systems which are irrelevant.