From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-430550-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13709 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2013 17:29:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13649 invoked by uid 48); 25 Sep 2013 17:29:42 -0000
From: "guillaume at eulerian dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/58531] [4.7/4.8 Regression] Strange array element ordering with O1 flag
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 17:29:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: guillaume at eulerian dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58531-4-GEWLdeizLI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58531-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg01790.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58531

--- Comment #4 from Guillaume <guillaume at eulerian dot com> ---
Ok i understand.

I took a sad brain shortcut assuming a single block declaration was generating
an (only possible) increasing address for each compound.
This was working on all previous gcc version i used (as far as i remember).
That's why it is worrying me.
I will correct my mistake and go punish myself ;)

Thanks a lot.