From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-433742-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 6137 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2013 17:26:45 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 1998 invoked by uid 55); 6 Nov 2013 17:24:43 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/58580] [4.8 Regression] preprocessor goes OOM with warning for zero literals
Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 17:26:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58580-4-asQ6W2wr21@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58580-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00519.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58580

--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 6 Nov 2013, dodji at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58580
> 
> Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>              Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|---                         |FIXED
> 
> --- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli <dodji at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> This should be fixed in trunk for 4.9 by commit
> http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=fc3eff8854861fcd70d33d26095b17fe456fae31
> 
> 
> I'll give it some testing time, and if it turns out to work OK, I'll consider
> backporting the change to 4.8.
> 
> What do you think, Richi?

Yes, backporting would be nice - it affects a few packages for us.