public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/58609] New: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with uninitialized variable in constexpr
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2013 21:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-58609-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58609
Bug ID: 58609
Summary: [4.9 Regression] [c++11] ICE with uninitialized
variable in constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org
The following invalid code snippet (compiled with "-std=c++11") triggers an ICE
on trunk (since at least GCC 4.9.0 20130920):
===================================
struct A
{
static constexpr int&& i = 0;
};
int j = A::i;
===================================
bug.cc:3:30: error: non-constant in-class initialization invalid for static
member 'A::i'
static constexpr int&& i = 0;
^
bug.cc:3:30: error: (an out of class initialization is required)
cc1plus: internal compiler error: in record_reference, at cgraphbuild.c:66
0x7ff843 record_reference
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphbuild.c:66
0xcf44ab walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, pointer_set_t*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node*
(*)(tree_node**, int*, void*), void*, pointer_set_t*))
../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:10928
0xcf48e5 walk_tree_1(tree_node**, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, void*),
void*, pointer_set_t*, tree_node* (*)(tree_node**, int*, tree_node*
(*)(tree_node**, int*, void*), void*, pointer_set_t*))
../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:11191
0x8001fd record_references_in_initializer(tree_node*, bool)
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphbuild.c:427
0xd2ce67 varpool_analyze_node(varpool_node*)
../../gcc/gcc/varpool.c:398
0x804147 analyze_functions
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1035
0x805669 finalize_compilation_unit()
../../gcc/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2260
0x6188a0 cp_write_global_declarations()
../../gcc/gcc/cp/decl2.c:4360
Please submit a full bug report, [etc.]
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-03 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-03 21:20 reichelt at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-10-10 11:39 ` [Bug c++/58609] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-05 14:47 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-03 10:36 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2014-03-07 18:34 ` paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-07 18:34 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-58609-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).