From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-447025-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 454 invoked by alias); 20 Mar 2014 19:18:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 403 invoked by uid 48); 20 Mar 2014 19:18:18 -0000
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/58622] With -fomit-frame-pointer, A64 does not generate post-decrement stores
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:18:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-58622-4-gptWSzngh7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58622-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01894.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58622

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |mshawcroft at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kugan from comment #2)
> Created attachment 32342 [details]
> Proposed RFC patch
> 
> Proposed RFC patch - In the process rgression testing.

Kugan,

This also needs to handle ILP32 and probably needs a bit more TLC than just
this. We have something ongoing that can help address this, so assigning to
Marcus as he's been looking into some of this.

However this is stage1 material and cannot make it in for 4.9.

Ramana


(In reply to Kugan from comment #2)
> Created attachment 32342 [details]
> Proposed RFC patch
> 
> Proposed RFC patch - In the process rgression testing.