From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-433988-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 18438 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2013 06:02:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18371 invoked by uid 48); 9 Nov 2013 06:01:57 -0000
From: "law at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/58640] [4.9 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 06:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-58640-4-NS8YpjPNCW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-58640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-58640-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00765.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58640

--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Oleg, I just worked through an independent problem that I saw locally that
probably explains your SH issue as well.  I expect to have a fix in the trunk
shortly.  I'll let you know so you can test it.