public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mtewoodbury at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug preprocessor/58687] "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 04:52:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-58687-4-kfLFIsS5aj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-58687-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687

--- Comment #21 from Max TenEyck Woodbury <mtewoodbury at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Joseph S. Myers from comment #20)
> Suspending pending a DR since I think the present code is correct and while
> the standard is ambiguous I think the interpretation here strains the
> wording of the standard.  I'd proposed to close this if a DR (or other WG14
> document) isn't under consideration at the Parma meeting of WG14.

A 'DR' is not necessary and is unlikely to be submitted.  The ambiguity
referred 
to is in the expansion of macros, not in the processing of directives.  

The elaborate description of the different forms of the '#line' (and other) 
directives makes it clear that <pp-token> expansion is not to take place until 
after the <end-of-line> for the directive has been seen.  

Accepted usage is for '#line __LINE__' to leave the line numbering unchanged.  
Any other interpretation would require some form of expression evaluation in 
order to leave line numbering unchanged; a possibility that has been rejected.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-29  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-11  3:47 [Bug preprocessor/58687] New: " mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-23  7:16 ` [Bug preprocessor/58687] " mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-25 19:01 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-25 22:56 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-26 13:39 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-26 21:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-27 13:59 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-28 17:51 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-28 18:53 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2013-10-30  7:39 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-30 15:08 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-30 17:59 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-30 18:13 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2013-10-30 19:43 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-10-31 18:00 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-11-04 14:14 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-11-04 18:18 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2013-11-19 16:08 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-11-19 16:37 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2013-11-28 22:52 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-29  4:52 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com [this message]
2013-11-29 16:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2013-11-29 22:49 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com
2013-11-30  0:04 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-58687-4-kfLFIsS5aj@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).