public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "mtewoodbury at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/58687] New: "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2013 03:47:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-58687-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58687 Bug ID: 58687 Summary: "#line __LINE__ ..." changes subsequent line numbers Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mtewoodbury at gmail dot com A preprocessor directive of the form '#line __LINE__ ..." should NOT change the line number. That is '__LINE__' should evaluate to the number of the NEXT line in this context. If you read the standards carefully, __LINE__ should have a value equal to the number of 'new line' characters seen by the phaee 1 translation plus one WHEN THE SUBSTITUTION OCCURS (unless modified by previous #line directives). When the subsituyion occurs is controlled by the parsing done in phase 4 of translation. Specifically, subsitution in preprocessing directives occure when the specific form of the directive has been formally identified AND that form calls for <pp_token> aubstitution. The form in this case is: '#' 'line' <pp_token>+ <new_line> Note that the terminating <new line> token has to have been seen BEFORE the form is identifiad. That means __LINE__ will normally have the line number of the NEXT line in the file when the substitution occurs. FURTHER NOTE that any <new line> tokens in comments will also have been counted when the substiturion occurs. What is apparently happening instead is that the substitution is being made BEFORE the particular form of the '#line' directive has been completely and formally identified. In other wordds you have folded the translation phases togeather and botched up the carefully structured procedure with its intentional delays in substitution set forth in the standard.
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-11 3:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-10-11 3:47 mtewoodbury at gmail dot com [this message] 2013-10-23 7:16 ` [Bug preprocessor/58687] " mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-25 19:01 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-25 22:56 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-26 13:39 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-26 21:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-27 13:59 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-28 17:51 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-28 18:53 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-10-30 7:39 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-30 15:08 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-30 17:59 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-30 18:13 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-10-30 19:43 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-10-31 18:00 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-11-04 14:14 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-11-04 18:18 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-11-19 16:08 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-11-19 16:37 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-11-28 22:52 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-29 4:52 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-11-29 16:57 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2013-11-29 22:49 ` mtewoodbury at gmail dot com 2013-11-30 0:04 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-58687-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).