public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/58711] New: Missing "uninitialized" warning in loop condition (when compiling without optimization)
@ 2013-10-13 5:10 mimomorin at gmail dot com
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: mimomorin at gmail dot com @ 2013-10-13 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58711
Bug ID: 58711
Summary: Missing "uninitialized" warning in loop condition
(when compiling without optimization)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mimomorin at gmail dot com
In the following code, `cond` is uninitialized in `while (cond)`. However,
the "uninitialized" warning (i.e. "variable 'cond' is uninitialized when used
here")
does not emit when compiling without optimization.
(If we compile it with optimization option, the warning is properly emitted.)
Tested on gcc 4.4-4.8, 4.9 (trunk).
int main(int argc, char* argv[])
{
int cond;
// Missing "uninitialized" warning
while (cond != 0) {
// `(void)` is used to avoid "unused-value" warning
(void)&cond;
}
return 0;
}
Clang has the same issue, but it's fixed recently.
( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16054 )
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2013-10-13 5:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-10-13 5:10 [Bug middle-end/58711] New: Missing "uninitialized" warning in loop condition (when compiling without optimization) mimomorin at gmail dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).