public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "markus at trippelsdorf dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/58712] New: [4.9 Regression] issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 12:14:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-58712-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58712 Bug ID: 58712 Summary: [4.9 Regression] issues found by --enable-checking=valgrind Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: markus at trippelsdorf dot de 1) ==4348== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==4348== at 0x5CF50C: cgraph_create_edge_1(cgraph_node*, cgraph_node*, gimple_statement_d*, long, int) (cgraph.c:695) ==4348== by 0x5D005E: cgraph_create_edge(cgraph_node*, cgraph_node*, gimple_statement_d*, long, int) (cgraph.c:890) ==4348== by 0x5D80A1: cgraph_clone_edge(cgraph_edge*, cgraph_node*, gimple_statement_d*, unsigned int, long, int, bool) (cgraphclones.c:135) ==4348== by 0x86C7E4: copy_body(copy_body_data*, long, int, basic_block_def*, basic_block_def*, basic_block_def*) (tree-inline.c:1741) ==4348== by 0x86F94F: optimize_inline_calls(tree_node*) (tree-inline.c:4258) ==4348== by 0xC0029A: (anonymous namespace)::pass_early_inline::execute() (ipa-inline.c:2257) ==4348== by 0x793AA9: execute_one_pass(opt_pass*) (passes.c:2202) ==4348== by 0x793C55: execute_pass_list(opt_pass*) (passes.c:2254) ==4348== by 0x7926C2: do_per_function_toporder(void (*)(void*), void*) (passes.c:1620) ==4348== by 0x7941A6: execute_ipa_pass_list(opt_pass*) (passes.c:2572) ==4348== by 0x5D7721: compile() (cgraphunit.c:1981) ==4348== by 0x5D7E24: finalize_compilation_unit() (cgraphunit.c:2269) ==4348== Probably caused by r201632. 2) ==9588== Use of uninitialised value of size 8 ==9588== at 0x8704C5: pointer_set_lookup(pointer_set_t const*, void const*, unsigned long*) (pointer-set.c:90) ==9588== by 0x870544: pointer_set_insert(pointer_set_t*, void const*) (pointer-set.c:147) ==9588== by 0x6AB402: analyze_functions() (cgraphunit.c:847) ==9588== by 0x6AC415: finalize_compilation_unit() (cgraphunit.c:2260) ==9588== by 0x568435: cp_write_global_declarations() (decl2.c:4421) ==9588== by 0x90095C: compile_file() (toplev.c:560) ==9588== by 0x902499: toplev_main(int, char**) (toplev.c:1893) ==9588== by 0x4ED5A6D: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.18.90.so) ==9588== ==9588== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==9588== at 0x8704CC: pointer_set_lookup(pointer_set_t const*, void const*, unsigned long*) (pointer-set.c:90) ==9588== by 0x870544: pointer_set_insert(pointer_set_t*, void const*) (pointer-set.c:147) ==9588== by 0x6AB402: analyze_functions() (cgraphunit.c:847) ==9588== by 0x6AC415: finalize_compilation_unit() (cgraphunit.c:2260) ==9588== by 0x568435: cp_write_global_declarations() (decl2.c:4421) ==9588== by 0x90095C: compile_file() (toplev.c:560) ==9588== by 0x902499: toplev_main(int, char**) (toplev.c:1893) ==9588== by 0x4ED5A6D: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.18.90.so) Probably caused by r200367. 3) ==1269== Invalid write of size 8 ==1269== at 0x63BDBD: iterative_hash_canonical_type(tree_node*, unsigned int) (gimple.c:3220) ==1269== by 0xC224F1: htab_find_slot (hashtab.c:704) ==1269== by 0x641818: gimple_register_canonical_type(tree_node*) (gimple.c:3488) ==1269== by 0x504AEB: lto_read_decls(lto_file_decl_data*, void const*, vec<ld_plugin_symbol_resolution, va_heap, vl_ptr>) (lto.c:2495) ==1269== by 0x505CBB: lto_main() (lto.c:2786) ==1269== by 0x7B3A95: compile_file() (toplev.c:546) ==1269== by 0x7B5619: toplev_main(int, char**) (toplev.c:1893) ==1269== by 0x4ED5A6D: (below main) (in /lib64/libc-2.18.90.so) ==1269== Address 0x40325a0 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd This is an older issue, see PR55358 for more info.
next reply other threads:[~2013-10-13 12:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-10-13 12:14 markus at trippelsdorf dot de [this message] 2013-10-14 7:36 ` [Bug other/58712] " markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2013-10-14 8:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-14 9:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-14 9:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-10-15 7:15 ` markus at trippelsdorf dot de 2013-10-24 17:28 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-05 15:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-05 15:12 ` octoploid at yandex dot com 2013-11-05 15:15 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-10 11:14 ` octoploid at yandex dot com 2013-11-12 21:33 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-24 9:52 ` octoploid at yandex dot com 2014-01-15 8:08 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-16 8:36 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-01-29 10:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-04 12:20 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2014-02-04 12:32 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-58712-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).