public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug sanitizer/58718] New: Invalid check in libsanitizer @ 2013-10-14 6:02 y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:03 ` [Bug sanitizer/58718] " y.gribov at samsung dot com ` (5 more replies) 0 siblings, 6 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-10-14 6:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 Bug ID: 58718 Summary: Invalid check in libsanitizer Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: y.gribov at samsung dot com CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org Created attachment 30998 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30998&action=edit Repro I've recently tried to run AddressSanitizer with malloc_context_size=0 runtime option to speedup execution of my program. I got nice perf improvements but also an internal abort in asan_allocator2.cc when it tried to report heap overflow warning: 0x60040000e004 is located 4 bytes to the right of 16-byte region [0x60040000dff0,0x60040000e000) ==3488== AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: /home/ygribov/gcc/gcc-master/libsanitizer/asan/asan_allocator2.cc:216 "((id)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) If I unset ASAN_OPTIONS, warning is reported correctly. -Y ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/58718] Invalid check in libsanitizer 2013-10-14 6:02 [Bug sanitizer/58718] New: Invalid check in libsanitizer y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-10-14 6:03 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:36 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com ` (4 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-10-14 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 --- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> --- Created attachment 30999 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30999&action=edit Proposed patch It seems that this CHECK should be removed to allow disabling malloc tracing. Patch is attached. -Y ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/58718] Invalid check in libsanitizer 2013-10-14 6:02 [Bug sanitizer/58718] New: Invalid check in libsanitizer y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:03 ` [Bug sanitizer/58718] " y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-10-14 6:36 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:49 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-10-14 6:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 --- Comment #3 from Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> --- Got it. I wonder whether we should keep the bug opened until we merge or close it now. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/58718] Invalid check in libsanitizer 2013-10-14 6:02 [Bug sanitizer/58718] New: Invalid check in libsanitizer y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:03 ` [Bug sanitizer/58718] " y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:36 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-10-14 6:49 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-05 8:21 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com ` (2 subsequent siblings) 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-10-14 6:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 --- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany <kcc at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I am currently testing a merge which is before Alexey's changes. There is no harm in keeping this bug open. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/58718] Invalid check in libsanitizer 2013-10-14 6:02 [Bug sanitizer/58718] New: Invalid check in libsanitizer y.gribov at samsung dot com ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2013-10-14 6:49 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-11-05 8:21 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-11-05 18:58 ` tetra2005 at gmail dot com 2013-12-31 5:34 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-11-05 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 --- Comment #5 from Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> --- (In reply to Alexey Samsonov from comment #2) > I've already fixed the problem with crashes caused by small > "malloc_context_size" values. I think you should wait till the ASan runtime > will be merged from LLVM into GCC. I can reproduce this with current Clang/compiler-rt: $ cat main.cpp int main() { delete new char[20]; return 0; } $ ~/install/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-clang -g -O0 main.cpp -fsanitize=address -o a.out $ ASAN_OPTIONS=malloc_context_size=0:fast_unwind_on_malloc=0 ./a.out ... ==15804==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: /mnt/scratch/ygribov/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/asan_allocator2.cc:237 "((id)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) -Y ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/58718] Invalid check in libsanitizer 2013-10-14 6:02 [Bug sanitizer/58718] New: Invalid check in libsanitizer y.gribov at samsung dot com ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2013-11-05 8:21 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-11-05 18:58 ` tetra2005 at gmail dot com 2013-12-31 5:34 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tetra2005 at gmail dot com @ 2013-11-05 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 --- Comment #7 from Yuri Gribov <tetra2005 at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #6) > Can we keep this bug in one place, please? > Let https://code.google.com/p/address-sanitizer/issues/detail?id=239 be the > primary one Ok, will do. I'm a little gcc-biased as you know. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [Bug sanitizer/58718] Invalid check in libsanitizer 2013-10-14 6:02 [Bug sanitizer/58718] New: Invalid check in libsanitizer y.gribov at samsung dot com ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2013-11-05 18:58 ` tetra2005 at gmail dot com @ 2013-12-31 5:34 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: y.gribov at samsung dot com @ 2013-12-31 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58718 Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #8 from Yury Gribov <y.gribov at samsung dot com> --- Works for me in Clang and GCC trunks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-31 5:34 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-10-14 6:02 [Bug sanitizer/58718] New: Invalid check in libsanitizer y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:03 ` [Bug sanitizer/58718] " y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:36 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-10-14 6:49 ` kcc at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-05 8:21 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com 2013-11-05 18:58 ` tetra2005 at gmail dot com 2013-12-31 5:34 ` y.gribov at samsung dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).