public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/58727] Sub-optimal code for bit clear/set sequence
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 21:49:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-58727-4-jO0Fo5O8Zb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-58727-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58727

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Component|rtl-optimization            |tree-optimization

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I see the issue:
clear_set produces:
  D.1381_2 = a_1(D) & 0xffbffffd;
  D.1380_3 = D.1381_2 | 2;

While clear_set_inline produces:
  D.1381_2 = a_1(D) & 0xffbfffff;
  D.1380_3 = D.1381_2 | 2;

The lower two bits make GCC optimize it easier.
I think the issue is in fold-const.c as .original is already includes the ~0x2
in the and part.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-10-14 21:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-14 20:01 [Bug tree-optimization/58727] New: " niels at penneman dot org
2013-10-14 20:18 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/58727] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-14 21:43 ` niels at penneman dot org
2013-10-14 21:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2013-10-14 22:08 ` [Bug tree-optimization/58727] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-15  7:06 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-10-15  8:35 ` niels at penneman dot org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-58727-4-jO0Fo5O8Zb@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).