From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id F2491385841C; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:47:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org F2491385841C From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/58820] lambda multiple inheritance operator() not ambiguous Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:47:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution blocked bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 20:47:35 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D58820 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |INVALID Blocks|54367 | Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Unrelated to lambdas really. Here is a C++98 code which shows the same iss= ue with clang: template struct i { t operator()(t i); }; struct overload_set1 : i, i { overload_set1() {} }; int main(void) { double d1 =3D 10; overload_set1 tt; tt(d1); } To make the original code work (you need C++17 really): Adding using Fs::operator()...; allows GCC (and ICC) to work. So this is a bug in clang. I don't think we need a testcase as we must likely already have a C++98 one even. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D54367 [Bug 54367] [meta-bug] lambda expressions=