From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D480E3858400; Tue, 31 Aug 2021 20:09:53 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D480E3858400 From: "harald at gigawatt dot nl" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/58876] No non-virtual-dtor warning in std::unique_ptr Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 20:09:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: harald at gigawatt dot nl X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 20:09:53 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D58876 Harald van Dijk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |harald at gigawatt dot nl --- Comment #12 from Harald van Dijk --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11) > No, probably not. Comment 2 doesn't work because -Wsystem-headers can't be > enabled and disabled using pragmas. It doesn't work like other warnings. However, the internal version of the #line directive, # [line number] [file name] [flags] could be used to mark a region of a system header as non-syst= em header, which should achieve the same result, right? It might need a bit of cleanup to be maintainable, but this seems to work as a proof of concept: --- bits/unique_ptr.h +++ bits/unique_ptr.h @@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ "can't delete pointer to incomplete type"); static_assert(sizeof(_Tp)>0, "can't delete pointer to incomplete type"); +# 86 __FILE__ delete __ptr; +# 88 __FILE__ 3 } };=