From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24400 invoked by alias); 27 Oct 2013 13:44:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 24377 invoked by uid 48); 27 Oct 2013 13:44:32 -0000 From: "mtewoodbury at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/58887] Allow recursion in varadic macros? Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2013 13:44:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: mtewoodbury at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg01977.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58887 --- Comment #2 from Max TenEyck Woodbury --- Eventually, that is where this will go, but the committee is MUCH more receptive of suggestions that have an implementation that people have had a chance to play with. GCC is one of the platforms where new ideas get tested. So, I believe it needs to be considered here. While I have not had news group access in recent years, I did watch and made comments on the committee's action for more than a decade and it is implemented extensions that get taken most seriously.