public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/58909] C++11's condition variables fail with static linking Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 18:39:45 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-58909-4-EYiOea5Rji@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-58909-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I don't think so. The linker just doesn't resolve the undefined weak symbol for pthread_cond_destroy is left equal to zero, and so there's a segfault when it gets called. $ g++ cv.C -static -g -Wl,--trace-symbol=pthread_cond_destroy -pthread /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/10/libstdc++.a(condition_variable.o): reference to pthread_cond_destroy IIUC it's not finding the definition in libc.a, or any definition at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-28 18:39 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-10-29 2:43 [Bug libstdc++/58909] New: C++11's condition variables fail with static linkin joel at clambassador dot com 2013-10-29 9:53 ` [Bug libstdc++/58909] C++11's condition variables fail with static linking jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-08 15:13 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2020-12-02 16:36 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 16:48 ` ksaunders at nowsecure dot com 2021-01-28 16:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 17:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 17:42 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 17:49 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 18:01 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 18:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 18:17 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 18:39 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2021-01-28 18:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 19:00 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 19:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 19:24 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-01-28 20:41 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-04-19 10:40 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-22 8:10 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-22 8:55 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2021-07-22 10:45 ` glisse at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-11 9:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-58909-4-EYiOea5Rji@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).