public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/59006] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_transform_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5963
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:10:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-59006-4-X4niD7dhUa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-59006-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59006

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, congh at google dot com wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59006
> 
> Cong Hou <congh at google dot com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |congh at google dot com
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Cong Hou <congh at google dot com> ---
> Hoisting all vectorized statements may not be the best solution (some loads may
> not be necessary outside of the loop), but I think it works and can solve the
> current issues. Richard, are you working on this? If you'd like I could also
> make a patch with this idea.

No, I was trying to fix it in another way but that didn't work out.

Feel free to take the bug (and yes, applying the invariant motion
after the vectorization transform, on the vectorized stmts).

Thanks,
Richard.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-20  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-05 14:30 [Bug c/59006] New: " regehr at cs dot utah.edu
2013-11-06 16:06 ` [Bug c/59006] " regehr at cs dot utah.edu
2013-11-06 17:24 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59006] [4.9 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-19 13:51 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-19 14:17 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-20  2:05 ` congh at google dot com
2013-11-20  9:10 ` rguenther at suse dot de [this message]
2014-01-14  9:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-14  9:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-59006-4-X4niD7dhUa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).