From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-435192-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 31234 invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2013 09:10:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31178 invoked by uid 55); 20 Nov 2013 09:10:17 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/59006] [4.9 Regression] internal compiler error: in vect_transform_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5963
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 09:10:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59006-4-X4niD7dhUa@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59006-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59006-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg01969.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59006

--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, congh at google dot com wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59006
> 
> Cong Hou <congh at google dot com> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |congh at google dot com
> 
> --- Comment #5 from Cong Hou <congh at google dot com> ---
> Hoisting all vectorized statements may not be the best solution (some loads may
> not be necessary outside of the loop), but I think it works and can solve the
> current issues. Richard, are you working on this? If you'd like I could also
> make a patch with this idea.

No, I was trying to fix it in another way but that didn't work out.

Feel free to take the bug (and yes, applying the invariant motion
after the vectorization transform, on the vectorized stmts).

Thanks,
Richard.