From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28491 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2013 14:01:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25867 invoked by uid 48); 6 Nov 2013 13:59:40 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/59021] [4.9 regression] new vzeroupper instructions generated with -mavx Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00501.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59021 Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- Kirill, can please someone from your team comment on the testcase? >>From gcc-bugs-return-433725-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 06 14:07:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2679 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2013 14:07:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 1910 invoked by uid 48); 6 Nov 2013 14:05:05 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/58580] [4.8 Regression] preprocessor goes OOM with warning for zero literals Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:07:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: preprocessor X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_known_to_work resolution short_desc cf_known_to_fail Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2 Content-length: 791 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58580 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Known to work| |4.9.0 Resolution|FIXED |--- Summary|[4.8/4.9 Regression] |[4.8 Regression] |preprocessor goes OOM with |preprocessor goes OOM with |warning for zero literals |warning for zero literals Known to fail| |4.8.2 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Yeah. Re-opening, fixed on trunk only sofar.