From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5729 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2013 14:38:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3478 invoked by uid 48); 6 Nov 2013 14:36:42 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/59021] [4.9 regression] new vzeroupper instructions generated with -mavx Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:38:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00506.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59021 --- Comment #2 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- Isn't the argument list a bit strange for call insn? (call_insn 20 19 21 2 (set (reg:SI 0 ax) (call (mem:QI (symbol_ref:DI ("foo") [flags 0x41] ) [0 foo S1 A8]) (const_int 16 [0x10]))) pr59021.c:15 660 {*call_value} (nil) (expr_list:V4DF (use (reg:V4DF 21 xmm0)) (expr_list:REG_BR_PRED (use (reg:SI 5 di)) (expr_list:REG_BR_PRED (use (reg:SI 4 si)) (expr_list:REG_BR_PRED (use (reg:SI 1 dx)) (expr_list:REG_BR_PRED (use (reg:SI 2 cx)) (expr_list:REG_BR_PRED (use (reg:SI 37 r8)) (expr_list:REG_DEAD (use (mem:BLK (reg/f:DI 7 s= p) [0 S12 A64])) (nil))))))))) These should be (expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (use (...)) >>From gcc-bugs-return-433730-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Nov 06 14:43:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15571 invoked by alias); 6 Nov 2013 14:43:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12608 invoked by uid 48); 6 Nov 2013 14:41:41 -0000 From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/58697] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code (segfaults) at -O3 Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:43:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 Content-length: 498 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58697 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- It's a dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 58653 ***