public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ysrumyan at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/59036] New: [4.9 regression] Performance degradation after r204212 on 32-bit x86 targets.
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 10:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-59036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59036

            Bug ID: 59036
           Summary: [4.9 regression] Performance degradation after r204212
                    on 32-bit x86 targets.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.9.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ysrumyan at gmail dot com

After patch to improve register preferencing in IRA and to *remove regmove*
pass we noticed performance degradation on several benchmarks from eembc2.0
suite in 32-bit mode for all x86 targets (such as atom, slm, hsw, etc.).
This can be reproduced with attached test-case - after fix 3 more instructions
are generated for innermost loop (compiled with -O2 -m32 -march=core-avx2
options):

  before fix
.L4:
    movl    12(%esp), %edx
    addl    $3, %ecx
    movl    4(%esp), %ebx
    movl    (%esp), %ebp
    movl    8(%esp), %esi
    movzbl    (%edx,%eax), %edi
    movl    16(%esp), %edx
    movzbl    (%ebx,%eax), %ebx
    movzbl    (%esi,%eax), %esi
    addl    $1, %eax
    addl    (%edx,%edi,4), %ebp
    movzbl    0(%ebp,%ebx), %edx
    movl    28(%esp), %ebp
    movb    %dl, -3(%ecx)
    movl    24(%esp), %edx
    movl    (%edx,%edi,4), %edx
    movl    (%esp), %edi
    addl    0(%ebp,%esi,4), %edx
    leal    (%edi,%ebx), %ebp
    sarl    $16, %edx
    movzbl    0(%ebp,%edx), %edx
    movl    20(%esp), %ebp
    movb    %dl, -2(%ecx)
    movl    0(%ebp,%esi,4), %edx
    addl    %edi, %edx
    movzbl    (%edx,%ebx), %edx
    movb    %dl, -1(%ecx)
    cmpl    80(%esp), %eax
    jne    .L4

  after fix
.L4:
    movl    8(%esp), %ebx
    addl    $3, %edx
    movl    12(%esp), %esi
    movl    4(%esp), %ecx
    movzbl    (%ebx,%eax), %ebx
    movzbl    (%esi,%eax), %esi
    movzbl    (%ecx,%eax), %ecx
    addl    $1, %eax
    movb    %bl, (%esp)
    movl    16(%esp), %ebx
    movl    (%ebx,%esi,4), %ebp
    addl    %edi, %ebp
    movzbl    0(%ebp,%ecx), %ebx
    movzbl    (%esp), %ebp
    movb    %bl, -3(%edx)
    movl    24(%esp), %ebx
    movl    %ebp, (%esp)
    movl    (%ebx,%esi,4), %esi
    movl    28(%esp), %ebx
    addl    (%ebx,%ebp,4), %esi
    leal    (%edi,%ecx), %ebp
    sarl    $16, %esi
    movzbl    0(%ebp,%esi), %ebx
    movl    20(%esp), %esi
    movl    (%esp), %ebp
    movb    %bl, -2(%edx)
    movl    %edi, %ebx
    addl    (%esi,%ebp,4), %ebx
    movzbl    (%ebx,%ecx), %ecx
    movb    %cl, -1(%edx)
    cmpl    80(%esp), %eax
    jne    .L4


             reply	other threads:[~2013-11-07 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-07 10:16 ysrumyan at gmail dot com [this message]
2013-11-07 10:18 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/59036] " ysrumyan at gmail dot com
2013-11-07 10:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-07 15:34 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-13 18:01 ` vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-19 15:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-59036-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).