From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13479 invoked by alias); 11 Nov 2013 07:19:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13415 invoked by uid 48); 11 Nov 2013 07:19:01 -0000 From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug sanitizer/59063] [4.9 Regression] ASAN: segfault in __interceptor_clock_gettime Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg01019.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59063 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2013-11-11 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > > I think in newer versions of glibc, clock_gettime is in libc.so now too. > > I think Andrew is right - clock_gettime is in libc nowadays. Should we > wontfix this bug? A trivial WAR for users would be to add -lrt to cmdline. It was just done for glibc 2.18 which was only released in the last year. Not everyone has the opportunity to upgrade to 2.18 yet or in some cases won't for years to come.