public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anlauf at gmx dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59065] questionable bounds for unassociated allocatable/pointer arrays? Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:10:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-59065-4-eTbgZ0nw4B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-59065-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59065 Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #6 from Harald Anlauf <anlauf at gmx dot de> --- (In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #5) > I do not think SIZE should be used to detect an undefined array > pointer, but a size of zero > warns the code that the array is mostly unusable and that perhaps > something is wrong, > while a nonzero size is telling the program it is fine to use the array. No. As Steve pointed out in comment #3, a zero sized array is perfectly fine. IMO that was a good choice in Fortran, so one does not have to special-case these when writing code. Your opinion may differ. Please also have a look at the Fortran standard, e.g. 13.7.156 SIZE (ARRAY [, DIM, KIND]) Description. Size of an array or one extent. Class. Inquiry function. Arguments. ARRAY shall be an array of any type. It shall not be an unallocated allocatable variable or a pointer that is not associated. ... > I agree with Dominique, I am still writing invalid code all the time, > also because interactive > computing makes it so easy and fast to write, compile, link and execute code. > When I used punched cards in the seventies I had more time to think > and reflect about my > programs, also because the turnaround time was about 30 minutes as compared > with 30 seconds today > If the programmers did not write invalid code many people would be out > of business:-) Or they would be more productive...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 19:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2013-11-10 10:29 [Bug fortran/59065] New: " zeccav at gmail dot com 2013-11-10 16:44 ` [Bug fortran/59065] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2013-11-10 19:46 ` zeccav at gmail dot com 2013-11-10 19:57 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2013-11-10 20:36 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr 2013-11-11 9:14 ` zeccav at gmail dot com 2013-11-11 19:10 ` anlauf at gmx dot de [this message] 2013-11-12 8:13 ` zeccav at gmail dot com 2013-11-12 14:20 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu 2013-11-12 15:52 ` zeccav at gmail dot com 2021-02-21 7:43 ` zeccav at gmail dot com 2021-02-21 9:41 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-59065-4-eTbgZ0nw4B@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).