From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19982 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2013 09:55:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19835 invoked by uid 48); 12 Nov 2013 09:55:01 -0000 From: "aivchenk at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug regression/59086] New: error:=?UTF-8?Q?=20=E2=80=98asm=E2=80=99=20operand=20has=20impossible=20constraints?= Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:55:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: regression X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: aivchenk at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg01121.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59086 Bug ID: 59086 Summary: error: =E2=80=98asm=E2=80=99 operand has impossible con= straints Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: regression Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: aivchenk at gmail dot com Android image build with trunk gcc failed after the following commit: Author: hubicka Date: Thu Oct 3 17:25:42 2013 +0000 * i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Do not enable accumulate-outgoing-args when producing unwind info. git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@203171 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The reduced testcase looks something like this (previous r203169 is able to compile it): #include void testFunc(int count) { int x; __m128i tmp1; __asm__( "1:\n" :"+d"(x) :[count] "m" (count), [tmp1] "m" (tmp1) :"ecx","esi","edi","eax" ); } The compiling options: gcc test.c -c -fPIC -mstackrealign -march=3Dcore-avx2 -m32 >>From gcc-bugs-return-434345-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Nov 12 11:19:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30283 invoked by alias); 12 Nov 2013 11:19:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 30209 invoked by uid 48); 12 Nov 2013 11:19:04 -0000 From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/29143] address-of overloaded function does not work in function call Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to target_milestone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg01122.txt.bz2 Content-length: 522 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29143 Paolo Carlini changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle dot com Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini --- Mine.