public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/59147] New: 128-bit division error
@ 2013-11-15 13:57 rglindley at gmail dot com
2013-11-15 16:05 ` [Bug target/59147] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rglindley at gmail dot com @ 2013-11-15 13:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
Bug ID: 59147
Summary: 128-bit division error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rglindley at gmail dot com
Created attachment 31226
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31226&action=edit
source code and .s file
128-bit division fails. See comments in source code attached.
The attachment contains source code with the .s file appended to the end as
comments. I could not figure out how to attach more than one file to this
report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug target/59147] 128-bit division error
2013-11-15 13:57 [Bug fortran/59147] New: 128-bit division error rglindley at gmail dot com
@ 2013-11-15 16:05 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 16:50 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-11-15 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target| |x86_64-w64-mingw32
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|fortran |target
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> It works for me on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (with -m64), x86_64-apple-darwin10,
> and x86_64-apple-darwin13. It looks like a bug in the 128-bit library of
> x86_64-w64-mingw32.
Works for me on x86_64-*-freebsd. gfortran versions from 4.2.x to trunk.
I've reset the component from fortran to target and added the target
triplet.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug target/59147] 128-bit division error
2013-11-15 13:57 [Bug fortran/59147] New: 128-bit division error rglindley at gmail dot com
2013-11-15 16:05 ` [Bug target/59147] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-17 16:50 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 17:31 ` rglindley at gmail dot com
2013-12-17 19:41 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-17 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2013-12-17
CC| |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I've tested testcase on x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross-compiler, and I can't
reproduce issue with current trunk.
As 4.6.1 isn't supported anymore upstream, could you test with more recent
gcc-version please?
Otherwise I will need to close bug a works for me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug target/59147] 128-bit division error
2013-11-15 13:57 [Bug fortran/59147] New: 128-bit division error rglindley at gmail dot com
2013-11-15 16:05 ` [Bug target/59147] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 16:50 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-17 17:31 ` rglindley at gmail dot com
2013-12-17 19:41 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: rglindley at gmail dot com @ 2013-12-17 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
--- Comment #5 from rglindley at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #4)
> I've tested testcase on x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross-compiler, and I can't
> reproduce issue with current trunk.
> As 4.6.1 isn't supported anymore upstream, could you test with more recent
> gcc-version please?
> Otherwise I will need to close bug a works for me.
Go ahead and close as far as I'm concerned. I will test again after I upgrade,
but that may be awhile as I'm in the middle of a project right now. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug target/59147] 128-bit division error
2013-11-15 13:57 [Bug fortran/59147] New: 128-bit division error rglindley at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-17 17:31 ` rglindley at gmail dot com
@ 2013-12-17 19:41 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-17 19:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59147
Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz <ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Ok, thanks for the feedback
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-12-17 19:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-11-15 13:57 [Bug fortran/59147] New: 128-bit division error rglindley at gmail dot com
2013-11-15 16:05 ` [Bug target/59147] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 16:50 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 17:31 ` rglindley at gmail dot com
2013-12-17 19:41 ` ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).