* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-11-18 15:49 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 16:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at redhat dot com @ 2013-11-18 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com> ---
> Is the line
>
> /* FIXME: This test has been xfailed until reductions are fixed. */
>
> still relevant? I don't see any xfail in the source.
>
The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a patch to gcc-patches
with your fix as well as removing the FIXME note?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-11-18 15:49 ` [Bug testsuite/59160] " aldyh at redhat dot com
@ 2013-11-18 16:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-11-18 16:05 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-11-18 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a patch to gcc-patches
> with your fix as well as removing the FIXME note?
Is the use of stdlib.h OK for other targets?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-11-18 15:49 ` [Bug testsuite/59160] " aldyh at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 16:02 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-11-18 16:05 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 16:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at redhat dot com @ 2013-11-18 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #3 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com> ---
On 11/18/13 09:02, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
>
> --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
>> The FIXME is not relevant anymore. Can you post a patch to gcc-patches
>> with your fix as well as removing the FIXME note?
>
> Is the use of stdlib.h OK for other targets?
>
You need to post it on gcc-patches because I am not a maintainer for
this piece of code.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-18 16:05 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
@ 2013-11-18 16:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-11-18 16:48 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-11-18 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> You need to post it on gcc-patches because I am not a maintainer for
> this piece of code.
Well, the test is yours. Who should I CC besides Iain Sandoe and Mike Stump?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-18 16:45 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-11-18 16:48 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 16:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: aldyh at redhat dot com @ 2013-11-18 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com> ---
On 11/18/13 09:45, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
>
> --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
>> You need to post it on gcc-patches because I am not a maintainer for
>> this piece of code.
>
> Well, the test is yours. Who should I CC besides Iain Sandoe and Mike Stump?
>
Ideally a testsuite or global write maintainer should ok it.
However, since it's such a small change... Your failure is on Darwin.
If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious.
Aldy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-18 16:48 ` aldyh at redhat dot com
@ 2013-11-18 16:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-11-18 16:58 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-11-18 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious.
That's the critical point: I cannot test the patch "on, say...Linux".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-18 16:53 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-11-18 16:58 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-18 17:13 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-11-18 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #7 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6)
> > If your change passes on, say...Linux, OK as obvious.
>
> That's the critical point: I cannot test the patch "on, say...Linux".
I'll check it out on Linux.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-18 16:58 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-11-18 17:13 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2013-11-18 18:22 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-11-18 17:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> I'll check it out on Linux.
Thanks. BTW the test fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (it was indeed
expected).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-18 17:13 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2013-11-18 18:22 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-18 18:47 ` law at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 18:49 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: iains at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-11-18 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> > I'll check it out on Linux.
>
> Thanks. BTW the test fails also on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (it was indeed
> expected).
no difference in results for "make check RUNTESTFLAGS=cilk-plus.exp" on
x86_64-linux-gnu after applying the change (FAOD, reduction-3.c passes for both
c and c++).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-18 18:22 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-11-18 18:47 ` law at redhat dot com
2013-11-18 18:49 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: law at redhat dot com @ 2013-11-18 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |law at redhat dot com
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law <law at redhat dot com> ---
Patch installed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [Bug testsuite/59160] The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)*.
2013-11-17 11:43 [Bug testsuite/59160] New: The test c-c++-common/cilk-plus/PS/reduction-3.c fails on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|3)* dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-11-18 18:47 ` law at redhat dot com
@ 2013-11-18 18:49 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
10 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2013-11-18 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59160
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> Patch installed.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread