From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7849 invoked by alias); 19 Nov 2013 16:41:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6320 invoked by uid 55); 19 Nov 2013 16:41:05 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/59193] Unused postfix operator temporaries Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:41:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg01878.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59193 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I see nothing at http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html that would apply such a C++ coding practice to the mostly C-like code in GCC. Changes to coding conventions should be proposed on the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list, not in Bugzilla; the mailing list is a better place to get consensus on such things and Bugzilla is better for things that are unambiguously bugs rather than stylistic or possibly controversial. Personally I think such changes are pointless when ordinary C integer / pointer types are in use.