From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4894 invoked by alias); 22 Nov 2013 09:48:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 4820 invoked by uid 55); 22 Nov 2013 09:48:46 -0000 From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/59235] [4.9 regression] SEGV in sparc_output_scratch_registers Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02259.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- > Ranier, > > The only sparc box in the farm is the painfully slow gcc54 which someone else > is hammering so bad there's no way I can reasonably test if the fix for 59221 > also fixes this bug. > > Can you update your local tree and rebuild and let me know if this problem is > resolved or not. It'd be greatly appreciated. Done. The two bootstraps (one at r205213 with your patch reverted, the other at r205233) completed successfully, and with the exception of one failure that turned out to be spurious and several go failures that I don't trust to be real at the moment, testsuite results were identical. Thanks. Rainer