From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9478 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2013 17:01:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9404 invoked by uid 48); 21 Nov 2013 17:01:29 -0000 From: "law at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/59235] [4.9 regression] SEGV in sparc_output_scratch_registers Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 17:01:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: law at redhat dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02211.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59235 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Probably the same dumb oversight that's causing 59221. I will, of course, verify that and take appropriate action. It's things like this that sometimes makes me question bootstrapping and regression testing's value :(