From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16340 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2013 08:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16293 invoked by uid 55); 24 Nov 2013 08:52:06 -0000 From: "smaheshs41 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/59264] Incorrect order of execution on increament/decrement operator Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 08:52:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: smaheshs41 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg02454.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59264 --- Comment #5 from Mahesh S --- [Bug c/59264] Incorrect order of execution on increament/decrement operator But it works correctly in Turbo C and Borland C compiler why not in gcc On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:23 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59264 > > Eric Botcazou changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |ebotcazou at gcc dot > gnu.org > > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > > but it gets executed correctly for 1st condition why not for 2nd and 3rd > > Both executions are correct since the code has undefined behavior. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You reported the bug. >