From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20333 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2013 18:48:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20280 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2013 18:48:34 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59313] gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 FAILs on Solaris/SPARC Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg03063.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59313 Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target|sparc*-sun-solaris2.* |sparc*-sun-solaris2.*, | |alpha-linux-gnu CC| |ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1) > I'm seeing this too. Me to, on alpha-linux-gnu, exactly the same numbers: 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000 0.00000000000000000000000000000000000 6167208123267181.00000000000000000000 Program aborted. Backtrace: #0 0x2000004F197 >>From gcc-bugs-return-436287-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 29 18:54:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22406 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2013 18:54:21 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 22363 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2013 18:54:17 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/59313] gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 FAILs on Solaris/SPARC Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 18:54:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg03064.txt.bz2 Content-length: 381 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59313 --- Comment #3 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak from comment #2) > Me to, on alpha-linux-gnu, exactly the same numbers: alpha-linux-gnu is 128 bit long double, but not __float128 target: auto-host.h:#define TARGET_DEFAULT_LONG_DOUBLE_128 1 Probably sparc also defines this. >>From gcc-bugs-return-436288-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Nov 29 19:31:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12315 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2013 19:31:49 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 12263 invoked by uid 48); 29 Nov 2013 19:31:45 -0000 From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/59176] [4.9 Regression] ICE edge points to wrong declaration / verify_cgraph_node failed Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 19:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg03065.txt.bz2 Content-length: 288 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59176 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus --- Now that PR59208 was fixed, I tried the test case of this PR again (with today's r205539). Result: Still the same, an ICE with -O3 in verify_cgraph_node. (-O2 is fine.)