From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-437540-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13711 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2013 22:17:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13665 invoked by uid 48); 13 Dec 2013 22:17:37 -0000
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libfortran/59313] gfortran.dg/erf_3.F90 FAILs on Solaris/SPARC
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 22:17:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libfortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: REOPENED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-59313-4-POtbRfIsTC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59313-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01195.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59313

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|FIXED                       |---

--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The link failure is still there on Solaris 9, probably because some long double
routines are missing from libm:

(botcazou@nile)
/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libgfortran
$ grep HAVE_ERFCL *.h
config.h:/* #undef HAVE_ERFCL */

(botcazou@nile)
/nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/libgfortran
$ grep HAVE_EXPL *.h
config.h:/* #undef HAVE_EXPL */