public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "andysem at mail dot ru" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/59325] New: Provide a way to disable deprecated warnings
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 08:40:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-59325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59325

            Bug ID: 59325
           Summary: Provide a way to disable deprecated warnings
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.8.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: enhancement
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: andysem at mail dot ru

In C++11 mode, libstdc++ marks some standard components from C++03 as
deprecated and emits warnings whenever these components are used. In particular
std::auto_ptr, std::bind1st and std::bind2nd are marked that way.

While the standard lists these components as deprecated, they are still used in
many libraries for portability reasons, so that the code compiles both in C++03
and C++11 modes. The problem is that the warnings are flagged not only for the
libraries but also for the client's code that uses them, and for the client
these warnings are useless and even harmful because they clutter the compiler
output. The suggested solution to disable the warnings by adding compiler
switches is too strong because not only libstdc++ warnings are disabled this
way but also other deprecated warnings too.

So, to sum up, my use case is as follows. Application A uses library B. A and B
are in C++11, but B uses C++03 legacy components for portability. B has its own
API and some parts of it get deprecated as new versions come out. The developer
of A is interested in seeing warnings about those API deprecation, but not
about B using legacy C++ internally.

My proposal is to add a configuration macro that, when defined by the user,
will disable deprecation warnings from libstdc++. This would solve the problem
in my example - the developer of A would define this macro and only see the
warnings from B and not libstdc++.


             reply	other threads:[~2013-11-28  8:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-28  8:40 andysem at mail dot ru [this message]
2013-11-28 11:14 ` [Bug libstdc++/59325] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-28 11:43 ` andysem at mail dot ru
2013-11-28 12:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-11-28 13:03 ` andysem at mail dot ru
2014-12-21 11:10 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-20 14:28 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-20 14:32 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-10-20 14:46 ` andysem at mail dot ru
2020-10-20 16:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-59325-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).