public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/59354] [4.8/4.9/5/Regression] Element swizzling produces invalid result with -O3
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:02:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-59354-4-foQ51IRiH2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-59354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5/Regression] |[4.8/4.9/5/Regression]
|Element swizzling produces |Element swizzling produces
|invalid result with -O3 |invalid result with -O3
|(tree-cunrolli pass |
|problem?) |
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
This is tree vectorizer problem, involving VECT_PACK_TRUNC expressions.
Initializing the source array with:
for (i = 0; i < 256; i++)
a[i] = i;
we can see the difference in the destination array:
-O2 (correct):
0, 1, 2, 3, 16, 17, 18, 19, 32, 33, 34, 35, 48, 49, 50, 51, 64, 65, 66, 67, 80,
81, 82, 83, 96, 97, 98, 99, 112, 113, 114, 115, 128, 129, 130, 131, 144, 145,
146, 147, 160, 161, 162, 163, 176, 177, 178, 179, 192, 193, 194, 195, 208, 209,
210, 211, 224, 225, 226, 227, 240, 241, 242, 243, 4, 5, 6, 7, 20, 21, 22, 23,
36, 37, 38, 39, 52, 53, 54, 55, 68, 69, 70, 71, 84, 85, 86, 87, 100, 101, 102,
103, 116, 117, 118, 119, 132, 133, 134, 135, 148, 149, 150, 151, 164, 165, 166,
167, 180, 181, 182, 183, 196, 197, 198, 199, 212, 213, 214, 215, 228, 229, 230,
231, 244, 245, 246, 247, 8, 9, 10, 11, 24, 25, 26, 27, 40, 41, 42, 43, 56, 57,
58, 59, 72, 73, 74, 75, 88, 89, 90, 91, 104, 105, 106, 107, 120, 121, 122, 123,
136, 137, 138, 139, 152, 153, 154, 155, 168, 169, 170, 171, 184, 185, 186, 187,
200, 201, 202, 203, 216, 217, 218, 219, 232, 233, 234, 235, 248, 249, 250, 251,
12, 13, 14, 15, 28, 29, 30, 31, 44, 45, 46, 47, 60, 61, 62, 63, 76, 77, 78, 79,
92, 93, 94, 95, 108, 109, 110, 111, 124, 125, 126, 127, 140, 141, 142, 143,
156, 157, 158, 159, 172, 173, 174, 175, 188, 189, 190, 191, 204, 205, 206, 207,
220, 221, 222, 223, 236, 237, 238, 239, 252, 253, 254, 255
-O3 (incorrect):
0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21,
22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41,
42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61,
62, 63, 4, 5, 6, 7, 20, 21, 22, 23, 36, 37, 38, 39, 52, 53, 54, 55, 68, 69, 70,
71, 84, 85, 86, 87, 100, 101, 102, 103, 116, 117, 118, 119, 132, 133, 134, 135,
148, 149, 150, 151, 164, 165, 166, 167, 180, 181, 182, 183, 196, 197, 198, 199,
212, 213, 214, 215, 228, 229, 230, 231, 244, 245, 246, 247, 8, 9, 10, 11, 24,
25, 26, 27, 40, 41, 42, 43, 56, 57, 58, 59, 72, 73, 74, 75, 88, 89, 90, 91,
104, 105, 106, 107, 120, 121, 122, 123, 136, 137, 138, 139, 152, 153, 154, 155,
168, 169, 170, 171, 184, 185, 186, 187, 200, 201, 202, 203, 216, 217, 218, 219,
232, 233, 234, 235, 248, 249, 250, 251, 12, 13, 14, 15, 28, 29, 30, 31, 44, 45,
46, 47, 60, 61, 62, 63, 76, 77, 78, 79, 92, 93, 94, 95, 108, 109, 110, 111,
124, 125, 126, 127, 140, 141, 142, 143, 156, 157, 158, 159, 172, 173, 174, 175,
188, 189, 190, 191, 204, 205, 206, 207, 220, 221, 222, 223, 236, 237, 238, 239,
252, 253, 254, 255
b[4] is already wrong.
This is the beginning of the optimized dump:
vect__24.6_185 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a];
vect__24.7_182 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 16B];
vect__24.8_176 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 32B];
vect__24.9_173 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 48B];
vect__24.10_160 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 64B];
vect__24.11_158 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 80B];
vect__24.12_155 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 96B];
vect__24.13_148 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 112B];
vect__24.14_145 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 128B];
vect__24.15_138 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 144B];
vect__24.16_136 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 160B];
vect__24.17_133 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 176B];
vect__24.18_126 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 192B];
vect__24.19_124 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 208B];
vect__24.20_111 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 224B];
vect__24.21_108 = MEM[(unsigned int *)&a + 240B];
vect__25.23_107 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__24.6_185, vect__24.7_182>;
vect__25.23_101 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__24.8_176, vect__24.9_173>;
vect__25.23_100 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__24.10_160, vect__24.11_158>;
vect__25.23_99 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__24.12_155, vect__24.13_148>;
vect__25.23_87 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__24.14_145, vect__24.15_138>;
vect__25.23_86 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__24.16_136, vect__24.17_133>;
vect__25.23_85 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__24.18_126, vect__24.19_124>;
vect__25.23_81 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__24.20_111, vect__24.21_108>;
vect__25.22_80 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__25.23_107, vect__25.23_101>;
vect__25.22_79 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__25.23_100, vect__25.23_99>;
vect__25.22_78 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__25.23_87, vect__25.23_86>;
vect__25.22_77 = VEC_PACK_TRUNC_EXPR <vect__25.23_85, vect__25.23_81>;
MEM[(unsigned char[256] *)&b] = vect__25.22_80;
MEM[(unsigned char[256] *)&b + 16B] = vect__25.22_79;
MEM[(unsigned char[256] *)&b + 32B] = vect__25.22_78;
MEM[(unsigned char[256] *)&b + 48B] = vect__25.22_77;
As can be seen, the first 64 elements of the destination array are simply
truncated first 64 elements of source array.
>From gcc-bugs-return-473126-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 14 07:13:09 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-473126-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6359 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2015 07:13:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 6295 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2015 07:13:01 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/59371] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Performance regression in GCC 4.8 and later versions.
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59371-4-G6fpuQuwwx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg01120.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1254
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59371
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Difference (-O2 vs -O3) of neatly formatted results in a 16x16 array:
--- res-O2.txt 2015-01-14 08:08:39.000000000 +0100
+++ res-O3.txt 2015-01-14 08:09:57.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-000, 001, 002, 003, 016, 017, 018, 019, 032, 033, 034, 035, 048, 049, 050,
051,
-064, 065, 066, 067, 080, 081, 082, 083, 096, 097, 098, 099, 112, 113, 114,
115,
-128, 129, 130, 131, 144, 145, 146, 147, 160, 161, 162, 163, 176, 177, 178,
179,
-192, 193, 194, 195, 208, 209, 210, 211, 224, 225, 226, 227, 240, 241, 242,
243,
+000, 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008, 009, 010, 011, 012, 013, 014,
015,
+016, 017, 018, 019, 020, 021, 022, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 030,
031,
+032, 033, 034, 035, 036, 037, 038, 039, 040, 041, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046,
047,
+048, 049, 050, 051, 052, 053, 054, 055, 056, 057, 058, 059, 060, 061, 062,
063,
004, 005, 006, 007, 020, 021, 022, 023, 036, 037, 038, 039, 052, 053, 054,
055,
068, 069, 070, 071, 084, 085, 086, 087, 100, 101, 102, 103, 116, 117, 118,
119,
132, 133, 134, 135, 148, 149, 150, 151, 164, 165, 166, 167, 180, 181, 182,
183,
The problem is only with the first 64 elements.
>From gcc-bugs-return-473127-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 14 07:14:20 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-473127-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7301 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2015 07:14:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7256 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2015 07:14:14 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/59354] [4.8/4.9/5/Regression] Element swizzling produces invalid result with -O3
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59354-4-eraPMlvjXL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59354-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg01121.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1253
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59354
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
Difference (-O2 vs -O3) of neatly formatted results in a 16x16 array:
--- res-O2.txt 2015-01-14 08:08:39.000000000 +0100
+++ res-O3.txt 2015-01-14 08:09:57.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
-000, 001, 002, 003, 016, 017, 018, 019, 032, 033, 034, 035, 048, 049, 050,
051,
-064, 065, 066, 067, 080, 081, 082, 083, 096, 097, 098, 099, 112, 113, 114,
115,
-128, 129, 130, 131, 144, 145, 146, 147, 160, 161, 162, 163, 176, 177, 178,
179,
-192, 193, 194, 195, 208, 209, 210, 211, 224, 225, 226, 227, 240, 241, 242,
243,
+000, 001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008, 009, 010, 011, 012, 013, 014,
015,
+016, 017, 018, 019, 020, 021, 022, 023, 024, 025, 026, 027, 028, 029, 030,
031,
+032, 033, 034, 035, 036, 037, 038, 039, 040, 041, 042, 043, 044, 045, 046,
047,
+048, 049, 050, 051, 052, 053, 054, 055, 056, 057, 058, 059, 060, 061, 062,
063,
004, 005, 006, 007, 020, 021, 022, 023, 036, 037, 038, 039, 052, 053, 054,
055,
068, 069, 070, 071, 084, 085, 086, 087, 100, 101, 102, 103, 116, 117, 118,
119,
132, 133, 134, 135, 148, 149, 150, 151, 164, 165, 166, 167, 180, 181, 182,
183,
The problem is only with the first 64 elements.
>From gcc-bugs-return-473128-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 14 07:14:50 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-473128-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8027 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2015 07:14:49 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7972 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2015 07:14:45 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/59371] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Performance regression in GCC 4.8 and later versions.
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:14:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.8.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59371-4-hTL2pudfsy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59371-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg01122.txt.bz2
Content-length: 291
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59371
--- Comment #14 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13)
> Difference (-O2 vs -O3) of neatly formatted results in a 16x16 array:
Sorry, this comment doesn't belong in this PR.
>From gcc-bugs-return-473129-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 14 07:52:34 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-473129-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31116 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2015 07:52:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 31078 invoked by uid 48); 14 Jan 2015 07:52:28 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/64545] failed gcc build: internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at ipa-inline.c:1693
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 07:52:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: major
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcctarget bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on component cc cf_gcchost everconfirmed cf_gccbuild
Message-ID: <bug-64545-4-mK3kbCyskw@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64545-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64545-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-01/txt/msg01123.txt.bz2
Content-length: 1654
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idd545
Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-01-14
Component|middle-end |ipa
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
Host|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Build|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu |
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Also happens with tramp3d on ppc64:
trippels@gcc2-power8 ~ % ~/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++ -Ofast -fprofile-generate
-mcpu=power8 -w tramp3d-v4.cpp
trippels@gcc2-power8 ~ % ./a.out --cartvis 1.0 0.0 --rhomin 1e-8 -n 20
...
trippels@gcc2-power8 ~ % ~/gcc_test/usr/local/bin/g++ -Ofast -fprofile-use
-mcpu=power8 -w tramp3d-v4.cpp
tramp3d-v4.cpp:64206:1: internal compiler error: in inline_small_functions, at
ipa-inline.c:1658
}
^
0x11041b0b inline_small_functions
../../gcc/gcc/ipa-inline.c:1658
0x11041b0b ipa_inline
../../gcc/gcc/ipa-inline.c:2167
0x11041b0b execute
../../gcc/gcc/ipa-inline.c:2539
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 7:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-30 14:25 [Bug c++/59354] New: Unexpected result in g++ when casting int to char from an stl vector to an array jori.liesenborgs at gmail dot com
2015-01-01 13:54 ` [Bug c++/59354] " gcc-bugzilla at contacts dot eelis.net
2015-01-07 20:30 ` [Bug middle-end/59354] " ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2015-01-08 11:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59354] Element swizzling produces invalid result with -O3 (tree-cunrolli pass problem?) ubizjak at gmail dot com
2015-01-08 14:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59354] [4.8/4.9/5/Regression] " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-01-08 14:54 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-08 14:59 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2015-01-14 7:02 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com [this message]
2015-01-14 8:52 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59354] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Element swizzling produces invalid result with -O3 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-14 8:57 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-14 8:59 ` ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com
2015-01-14 9:47 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2015-01-14 14:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-01-14 14:09 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59354] [4.8/4.9 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-02-23 12:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/59354] [4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-59354-4-foQ51IRiH2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).