From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-436860-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 20180 invoked by alias); 6 Dec 2013 16:31:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20121 invoked by uid 48); 6 Dec 2013 16:31:14 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug sanitizer/59410] Some tsan tests fail with 4GB RAM
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:31:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: sanitizer
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59410-4-bOHXjfFlOO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59410-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59410-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00515.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59410

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
BTW, the tsan.exp tests don't seem to be as cheap as was claimed during the
patch submission, I'd prefer to at least throttle the torture options down to
say -O0 and -O2 rather than so many different variants when the tests are
really small and optimizations don't really affect them that much if at all.