From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-437035-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28796 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2013 09:58:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28774 invoked by uid 48); 9 Dec 2013 09:58:10 -0000
From: "janus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/59411] Problem with TYPE(C_PTR) constant initialization
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 09:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: janus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59411-4-POLKgpfwru@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59411-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg00690.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59411

--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to mrestelli from comment #4)
> type(t), parameter :: pp = suitable_initialization_expr_for_type_t
> type(t), parameter :: p2 = pp
> 
> I would assume that, provided the first assignment is correct, the
> second one is always correct, whatever the definition of type(t). Am I
> right?

I would think so. It is important, though, that pp is a PARAMETER.