[Bug go/59431] [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris

["ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431

--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
This should now be fixed by [1].

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00565.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-439900-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jan 10 08:33:44 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-439900-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18382 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2014 08:33:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18330 invoked by uid 55); 10 Jan 2014 08:33:39 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/59723] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_tree, at lto-streamer-out.c:1390 when compiling some Fortran tests with -flto
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59723-4-UxGQK1MOl9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59723-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59723-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01042.txt.bz2
Content-length: 862

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY723

--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:

> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY723
>
> --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > ... which implies that the GCC testsuite needs to be improved with regards
> > to LTO testing as there was no new failure with the patch.

Maybe ... but if you modify LTO code for a feature I'd expect you
try LTO on a simple example using that feature ;)

> Not GCC, but gfortran. I stumbled on this pr with
>
> make -k check-gfortran
> RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32/-flto,-m64/-flto}'"
>
> One may consider to add something '-Ofast -flto' to the set of options in
> gfortran.dg.

One always has to weight in testing time of course.