* [Bug go/59431] [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-09 15:34 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 18:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-09 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-09 15:34 ` [Bug go/59431] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-12-17 18:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-01-10 7:38 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-12-17 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P5
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-09 15:34 ` [Bug go/59431] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-12-17 18:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-01-10 7:38 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2014-01-10 9:42 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ubizjak at gmail dot com @ 2014-01-10 7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
--- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
This should now be fixed by [1].
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00565.html
>From gcc-bugs-return-439900-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jan 10 08:33:44 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-439900-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18382 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2014 08:33:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18330 invoked by uid 55); 10 Jan 2014 08:33:39 -0000
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug lto/59723] [4.9 Regression] ICE: in lto_output_tree, at lto-streamer-out.c:1390 when compiling some Fortran tests with -flto
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:33:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: lto
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59723-4-UxGQK1MOl9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59723-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59723-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg01042.txt.bz2
Content-length: 862
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY723
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY723
>
> --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > ... which implies that the GCC testsuite needs to be improved with regards
> > to LTO testing as there was no new failure with the patch.
Maybe ... but if you modify LTO code for a feature I'd expect you
try LTO on a simple example using that feature ;)
> Not GCC, but gfortran. I stumbled on this pr with
>
> make -k check-gfortran
> RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32/-flto,-m64/-flto}'"
>
> One may consider to add something '-Ofast -flto' to the set of options in
> gfortran.dg.
One always has to weight in testing time of course.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-10 7:38 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
@ 2014-01-10 9:42 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2014-01-10 17:04 ` ian at airs dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2014-01-10 9:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
I thought so myself when I saw the patch and fired off an
i386-pc-solaris2.10 bootstrap. Unfortunately, the failures remain.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-10 9:42 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2014-01-10 17:04 ` ian at airs dot com
2014-02-20 13:36 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ian at airs dot com @ 2014-01-10 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> ---
Yeah, I didn't think that would fix this problem, I was just hoping for more
consistent error messages--e.g., "out of memory" rather than "caught signal
while mallocing: 10".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2014-01-10 17:04 ` ian at airs dot com
@ 2014-02-20 13:36 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
2014-04-22 11:38 ` [Bug go/59431] [4.9/4.10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE @ 2014-02-20 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com> ---
> Yeah, I didn't think that would fix this problem, I was just hoping for more
> consistent error messages--e.g., "out of memory" rather than "caught signal
> while mallocing: 10".
I've now looked a bit closer and found that runtime_SysAlloc is indeed
failing. The problem seems to be documented behavior of mmap(2) in
32-bit processes on Solaris:
The size requested is incremented by the 16 Kbytes for these
pages and is then subject to rounding constraints. The con-
straints are:
o For 32-bit processes:
If length > 4 Mbytes
round to 4-Mbyte multiple
elseif length > 512 Kbytes
round to 512-Kbyte multiple
else
round to 64-Kbyte multiple
E.g. for os/check, I find almost 50000 512-byte allocations, each of
which costs 64 kB of virtual address space. This will quickly exhaust 4
GB, while not being a noticable problem for 64-bit processes.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9/4.10 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-20 13:36 ` ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
@ 2014-04-22 11:38 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-04-22 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.9.1
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.0 has been released
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9/4.10 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2014-04-22 11:38 ` [Bug go/59431] [4.9/4.10 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-10-30 11:29 ` [Bug go/59431] [4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-07-16 13:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.1 |4.9.2
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.1 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9/5 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-10-30 11:29 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:18 ` [Bug go/59431] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-10-30 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.2 |4.9.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.2 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9/5/6 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2014-10-30 11:29 ` [Bug go/59431] [4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [4.9/5/6 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:18 ` [Bug go/59431] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:47 ` [Bug go/59431] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [9/10/11/12 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:39 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 9:47 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [9/10/11/12 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:47 ` [Bug go/59431] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:35 ` [Bug go/59431] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [10/11/12/13 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:06 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:30 ` [Bug go/59431] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [10/11/12/13 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:35 ` [Bug go/59431] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:30 ` [Bug go/59431] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug go/59431] [11/12/13/14 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris
2013-12-09 15:33 [Bug go/59431] New: [4.9 regression] runtime FAILs on Solaris ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:30 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59431
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #17 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread