From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-440985-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10174 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2014 10:13:18 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10121 invoked by uid 48); 20 Jan 2014 10:13:14 -0000
From: "algrant at acm dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:13:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: algrant at acm dot org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59448-4-WxaiQBnYXc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59448-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59448-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg02127.txt.bz2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448

--- Comment #8 from algrant at acm dot org ---
I don't see how f can not be 0 or 1 here, but to make this even more clear
that there is no UB, define flag this way:

  static std::atomic<unsigned int> flag(0);

and calculate the address this way:

      d = *(&data + (f - f));                                 // B.B

The ordering requirements are the same, and there is no possibility of UB.