public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/59464] Unnecessary vector register spill
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:21:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-59464-4-tL5PPi8zYI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-59464-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59464

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2013-12-11
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
struct8 (struct test_structure_8 ts)
{
  vector(4) float vect__2.10;
  vector(4) float vect_ts_f1_9.9;
  struct test_structure_8 D.1759;

;;   basic block 2, loop depth 0
;;    pred:       ENTRY
  vect_ts_f1_9.9_15 = MEM[(struct  *)&ts];
  vect__2.10_17 = vect_ts_f1_9.9_15 + { 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0, 1.0e+0 };
  MEM[(struct  *)&D.1759] = vect__2.10_17;
  return D.1759;
;;    succ:       EXIT

}

OTOH the code generated is much much worse if you disable vectorization.

Then we should make sure the stack slot we spill the arguments to is
properly aligned so we can avoid the UNSPEC_LOADU.  This eventually
can lead to cleanup opportunities.

Ideally we'd recognize that we can more optimally load from the argument
registers into a V4SF register of course (but due to the way we do argument
setup during expand this may not be easily possible).

It's of course the bad ABI choice that leads to this mess ...


      reply	other threads:[~2013-12-11  9:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-11  0:54 [Bug target/59464] New: " hjl.tools at gmail dot com
2013-12-11  9:21 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-59464-4-tL5PPi8zYI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).