[Bug libstdc++/59508] std::find could use specialized container's find

["daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59508

--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2)
> Could you please elaborate?

My response was referring to the generic code that you provided, because that
would also be applied to user-provided specializations of library containers
and there iterator types. So it would only be feasible for a special scenario
where the library would tag its internal types and where it can proof that the
actual predicate used is equivalent to the usage of the associative container's
predicate.
>From gcc-bugs-return-437648-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Dec 15 18:39:19 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-437648-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5410 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2013 18:39:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5373 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2013 18:39:15 -0000
From: "octoploid at yandex dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug ipa/59469] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LLVM build failure with gcc LTO
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:39:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: octoploid at yandex dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-59469-4-SelnKZ69dq@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-59469-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-59469-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01303.txt.bz2
Content-length: 492

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idY469

--- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf <octoploid at yandex dot com> ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13)
> > Can you try bfd linker, hjl/linux/release/2.24.51.0.2, from
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=summary
> >
> > It has a modified LTO bfd linker.
>
> You need to build LLVM from scratch with my bfd linker.

I've tried your bfd version, but it doesn't help.