From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3735 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2013 18:34:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3706 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2013 18:34:33 -0000 From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/59508] std::find could use specialized container's find Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:34:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01302.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D59508 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2) > Could you please elaborate? My response was referring to the generic code that you provided, because th= at would also be applied to user-provided specializations of library containers and there iterator types. So it would only be feasible for a special scenar= io where the library would tag its internal types and where it can proof that = the actual predicate used is equivalent to the usage of the associative contain= er's predicate. >>From gcc-bugs-return-437648-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Dec 15 18:39:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5410 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2013 18:39:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5373 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2013 18:39:15 -0000 From: "octoploid at yandex dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/59469] [4.8/4.9 Regression] LLVM build failure with gcc LTO Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2013 18:39:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: lto X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: octoploid at yandex dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2013-12/txt/msg01303.txt.bz2 Content-length: 492 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59469 --- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #14) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > > Can you try bfd linker, hjl/linux/release/2.24.51.0.2, from > > > > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=summary > > > > It has a modified LTO bfd linker. > > You need to build LLVM from scratch with my bfd linker. I've tried your bfd version, but it doesn't help.